Abstract
This article seeks to analyze the protection of animals from the different currents of thought that develop the relationship between human beings and sentient beings, such as anthropocentric, biocentric and other visions that seek recognition of the rights of animals. animals. From the immersion of these visions, some jurisprudential discussions will be exposed that intend to open the borders of the constitutional mechanisms established in the Political Constitution of 1991, such as the unconstitutional public action, tutelage action, popular action and habeas corpus, which from the judicial decision will seek to promote a constitutional debate in progress to gradually guarantee the recognition of animals in the Law as subjects of special protection.
Publisher
Fundacion Universitaria Los Libertadores
Reference26 articles.
1. Ángel Botero, C. (2022). Hacer especie en el juzgado: el caso del oso "Chucho". Revista Derecho del Estado. 54, pp. 381-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n54.12.
2. Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sala Primera de Revisión. (5 de junio de 1992). Sentencia T 406 de 1992. [M.P. Ciro Angarita Barón].
3. Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sala Plena. (30 de agosto de 2010). Sentencia C 666 de 2010. [M.P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto].
4. Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sala Segunda de Revisión. (6 de abril de 2012). Sentencia T 155 de 2012. [M.P. María Victoria Calle Correa].
5. Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sala Plena. (14 de mayo de 2014). Sentencia C 283 de 2014. [M.P. Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio].