Two Methods to Detect Poorly Sealed Monitoring Wells Using Pumping Test Data in a Confined Aquifer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Two Methods to Detect Poorly Sealed Monitoring Wells Using Pumping Test Data in a Confined Aquifer

Published:2018-07-10 Issue:1 Volume:42 Page:20170032
ISSN:0149-6115
Container-title:Geotechnical Testing Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Geotech. Test. J.

Author:

Chapuis Robert P.¹,Chenaf Djaouida²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, École Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montreal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada (Corresponding author) e-mail: robert.chapuis@polymtl.ca, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-9374

2. Department of Civil Engineering, Royal Military College, 13 General Crerar Crescent, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada

Publisher

ASTM International

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Influence of a Shaky Start upon Overdamped or Underdamped Field Permeability (Slug) Test Results;Geotechnical Testing Journal;2024-09-01

2. Specific Storage or Elastic Modulus of Solid Matrix in Aquifers and Aquitards—Results from Slug Tests: A Review and a Clarification;Geotechnical Testing Journal;2023-11-20

3. How to Correctly Interpret Strange Data for Field Permeability (Slug) Tests in Monitoring Wells or between Packers;Geotechnical Testing Journal;2022-10-14

4. The Physical Reasons to Have Underdamped or Oscillating Variable-Head (Slug) Tests: A Review and a Clarification;Geotechnical Testing Journal;2021-09-14

5. Examples of Variable-Head Field Permeability Tests Used in Books: Given Interpretations and Correct Interpretations;Geotechnical Testing Journal;2020-10-14