Affiliation:
1. Istanbul Medeniyet University
Abstract
In the context of ongoing economic discussion, the connection between government actions and economic performance remains an important issue. There exist diverse opinions and arguments regarding how fiscal policy affects the unemployment rate from both empirical and theoretical perspective. The objective of this research is to explore the response of unemployment rate to fiscal policy shocks, namely government expenditure and tax revenue shocks. To achieve this goal, we gather annual data spanning from 1990 to 2021 for Türkiye employing recursive Structural VAR model. The results show that a tax revenue shock, corresponding to a one standard deviation change, initially results in a temporary decline in the unemployment but it positively affects the unemployment rate in the long run. Furthermore, the reaction of the unemployment to a government spending shock follows a hump-shape pattern. Hence, we can conclude that the government expenditure shock increases unemployment rate temporarily but decreases it slightly over the long term.
Publisher
Yonetim ve Ekonomi Arastirmalari Dergisi - Journal of Management and Economics Research
Reference27 articles.
1. Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002) “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117(4), pp. 1329- 1368.
2. Bassanini, A. and Duval, R. (2006) “Employment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 486.
3. Bassanini, A. and Duval, R. (2007) “The Determinants of Unemployment Across OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions”, OECD Economic Studies, 2006(1), 7-86.
4. Berument, H., Dogan, N., and Tansel, A. (2006) “Economic Performance and Unemployment: Evidence From an Emerging Economy”, International Journal of Manpower, 604-623.
5. Bova, E., Kolerus, C. and Tapsoba, S. J. (2015) “A Fiscal Job? An Analysis of Fiscal Policy and the Labor Market”, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4, 1-17.