Faculty’s perception of their role as a tutor during Problem-Based Learning activity in undergraduate medical education

Author:

Sunarno Isharyah1,Mannyu Budu2,As’ad Suryani3,Asriyani Sri4,Yusuf Irawan5,Masadah Rina6,Bukhari Agussalim3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

2. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

3. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

4. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

5. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

6. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia; Department of Pathological Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

Abstract

Introduction: The study aimed to ascertain how the faculty at the Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University perceived their role as a tutor during a problem-based learning activity during the academic phase of medical education, based on the length of time they acted as a tutor. Methods: This was prospective observational research with an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, which was performed at the Undergraduate Medical Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, from January 2023 until May 2023. Research subjects were divided into two groups: a) the Novice group and b) the Expert group. Quantitative data were collected by giving a questionnaire containing six categories with 35 questions and distributed by Google form. An independent t-test was used to compare the faculty’s perception, with a p-value <.05 significant. Followed by Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for qualitative data, which then were analysed by thematic analysis. The last stage is integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Results: There were statistically significant differences in seven issues between the two groups. Most of the tutors in both groups had favorable opinions, except for the expert group's disagreement with the passive role of the tutor in the tutorial group. Eight positive and twelve negative perceptions were found in the FGD. Conclusion: Most tutors positively perceived their role in PBL, with the expert group having more dependable opinions and well-reasoned suggestions. Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Undergraduate Medical Education, Focus Group Discussion

Publisher

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3