Faculty development of medical educators: Training evaluation and key challenges
-
Published:2022-07-05
Issue:3
Volume:7
Page:23-32
-
ISSN:2424-9335
-
Container-title:The Asia Pacific Scholar
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:TAPS
Author:
Naing Tun Tun, ,Minamoto Yuriko,Aung Ye Phyo,Than Marlar, , ,
Abstract
Introduction: With the evolution of healthcare needs for the community and the changing trends in medical education in the 21st century, medical educators need to be prepared for their tasks in the coming decades. Medical educator training is crucial but other factors can also affect the development of their competency. This study aims to measure the impact of the medical educators’ training course and find out the key challenges encountered by the medical educators in Myanmar. Methods: A retrospective quantitative design was conducted on 45 respondents by four levels of Kirkpatrick’s model assessment consisting of 39 statements and 9 items of key challenges, using five-point Likert scale. The item scores were analysed as mean and standard deviation, ‘t’ test and ANOVA were used for relationship between impact of training and demographic background. Results: There was significant association between the impact of training and the educational background (p=0.03), job position (p=0.02), and academic year attended (p=0.03). The respondents distinctly agreed that the training increased their knowledge and attitudes and that they could apply the learnt lessons practically in their workplace (minimum 3.750.60 and maximum 4.280.50). Regarding the key challenges, respondents viewed that their institution needed to support more scholarship opportunities and academic recognition; encourage networking and strengthen ICT-based medical education system (minimum 2.550.84 – maximum 4.170.71). Conclusion: This study indicates that enhancing the competency of medical educators with medical educator training programs is effective and useful; but inadequacy of institutional support for faculty development and internet facilities posed challenges in the overall faculty development.
Publisher
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
Subject
Health Professions (miscellaneous),Education,Reviews and References (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference20 articles.
1. Benor, D. (2000). Faculty development, teacher training and teacher accreditation in medical education: Twenty years from now. Medical Teacher, 22(5), 503-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050110795 2. Boucher, B., Chyka, P., Fitzgerald, W., Hak, L., Miller, D., Parker, R., Phelps, S., Wood, G., & Gourley, D. (2006). A comprehensive approach to faculty development. American Journal of Pharma- ceutical Education, 70(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700227 3. Cilliers, F., & Herman, N. (2010). Impact of an educational development programme on teaching practice of academics at a research‐intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2010.497698 4. Crosby, R. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer - the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/014215900409429 5. Fishbein, M., Hennessy, M., Yzer, M., & Douglas, J. (2003). Can we explain why some people do and some people do not act on their intentions? Psychology, Health &Amp; Medicine, 8(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354850021000059223
|
|