Implementation of a new Single-Pass Whole-Body Computed Tomography Protocol: Is it safe, effective and efficient in patients with severe trauma?

Author:

Ordoñez Carlos1,García Carlos2,W. Parra Michael3,Angamarca Edison4,Guzmán-Rodríguez Mónica5,P. Orlas Claudia6,Herrera-Escobar Juan Pablo6,Rincón Erika2,Meléndez Juan José4,Serna Jose Julián7,Padilla Natalia8,del Valle Ana Milena4,García Alberto F.7,Holguín Alfonso2

Affiliation:

1. director en especializacion de cirugía de trauma y emergencias

2. Fundacion Valle del Lili, Radiology Department, Cali, Colombia

3. Department of Trauma Critical Care, Broward General Level I Trauma Center. Fort Lauderdale, FL.

4. Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia

5. Fundacion Valle del Lili, Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas (CIC) , Cali, Colombia

6. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Boston, MA.

7. Fundacion Valle del Lili, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Cali, Colombia

8. Universidad ICESI, Facultad de Medicina, Cali, Colombia

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a new Single-Pass WBCT Protocol in the management of patients with severe trauma. Methods: This was an observational, prospective study of polytrauma patients who underwent WBCT. Patients were divided into three groups: 1. Blunt trauma hemodynamically stable 2. Blunt trauma hemodynamically unstable and 3. Penetrating trauma. Demographics, WBCT parameters and outcome variables were evaluated. Results: 263 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 22 (IQR: 16-22). Time between arrival to the ED and completing the WBCT was under 30 minutes in most patients [Group 1: 28 minutes (IQR: 14-55), Group 2: 29 minutes (IQR: 16-57), and Group 3: 31 minutes (IQR: 13-50); p=0.96]. 172 patients (65.4%) underwent non-operative management. The calculated and the real survival rates did not vary among the groups either [Group 1: TRISS 86.4% vs. RSR 85% (p=0.69); Group 2: TRISS 69% vs. RSR 74% (p=0.25); Group 3: TRISS 93% vs. RSR 87% (p=0.07)]. Conclusion: This new Single-Pass WBCT Protocol was safe, effective and efficient to decide whether the patient with severe trauma requires a surgical intervention independently of the mechanism of injury or the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Its use could also potentially reduce the rate of unnecessary surgical interventions of patients with severe trauma including those with penetrating trauma.

Publisher

Universidad del Valle

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3