Abstract
Objectives To describe means for disposing organic waste from bovine necropsies carried out on-farm, and to look for associated factors.
Materials and Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in 421 rural Veterinarians on the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis included χ2, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman's correlation.
Results Ninety percent of respondents (n=381) performed necropsies. The most frequent practice was to leave the remains in the place where it was carried out or to take them to a specific site, while the least frequent was to cover them with calcium hydroxide and plastic membranes. The geographical region of professional practice was associated in various ways to waste management. These results show inconsistencies in the protocols for organic waste disposal under field conditions in the region under study.
Conclusions It is important to encouraged during undergraduate studies both legal and biological knowledge on the consequences of inappropriate disposal of biopathogenic waste. Moreover, continuing education programs for graduates should include standardized protocols for the safe execution of these practices.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference20 articles.
1. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA). Stock ganadero [Internet]. SENASA, República Argentina. 2018 [citado el 3 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: https://shorturl.at/huxAX.
2. Gwyther CL, Williams AP, Golyshin PN, Edwards-Jones G, Jones DL. The environmental and biosecurity characteristics of livestock carcass disposal methods: A review. Waste Manag [Internet]. 2011 [citado el 3 de mayo de 2021]; 31(4):767-778. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.005.
3. Kwon MJ, Yun ST, Ham B, Lee JH, Oh JS, Jheong WW. Impacts of leachates from livestock carcass burial and manure heap sites on groundwater geochemistry and microbial community structure. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017 [citado el 3 de mayo de 2021]; 12:e0182579. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182579.
4. Yuan Q, Snow D, Bartelt-Hunt S. Potential water quality impacts originating from land burial of cattle. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2013 [citado el 3 de mayo de 2021]; 456-457:246-53. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.083.
5. Freedman R, Fleming R. Water quality impact of burying livestock mor- talities [Internet]. Presented to the Livestock Mortality Recycling Project Steering Committee. Ridgetown College, University of Guelph. 2003 [citado el 28 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://shorturl.at/gnJR4.