Abstract
The economic discipline is characterised by hierarchical dualisms. This paper examines formal/informal and productive/reproductive binary categories by means of a dialogue between the social reproduction theory and the popular economy. A starting point is the wealth of feminist contributions that highlight both reproduction and work as the heart of socioeconomic phenomena. Based on formalization processes in Latin America, the article explores how public policy interventions focus on the productive sphere. However, upon closer examination, these policies seem to neglect reproductive activities, as well as the demands of popular sectors. We argue that the contributions of feminism are necessary to broaden the economic field.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference93 articles.
1. Agenjo-Calderón, A. (2016). Repensando la economía feminista desde las propuestas de(s)coloniales. Revista de Economía Crítica, 22, 92-107.
2. Amarante, V., & Perazzo, I. (2013). Trabajo por cuenta propia y monotributo en el Uruguay. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 132(3-4), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-9148.2013.00197.x
3. Barragan, R. (2017). Working silver for the world: Mining labor and popular economy in colonial Potosí. Hispanic American Historical Review, 97(2), 193-222. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-3824041
4. Benería, L. (2019). Reproducción, producción y división sexual del trabajo. REC. Revista de Economía Crítica, 28(segundo semestre), 129-152.
5. Bhattacharya, T. (2015). How not to skip class: Social reproduction of labor and the global working class. https://www.viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/how-not-to-skip-class-social-reproduction-of-labor-andthe-global-working-class/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献