Abstract
This paper aims to explain the causes of the 2018/2019 Argentinian crisis by means of a growth cycle model a la Goodwin, where the aggregate demand is wage-led, the wage-share is predatory of the external sector, and the financial norm stands as an exogenous apex-predator of both real wages and the current account. Its main results allow us to understand the stylized facts of the Argentinian economy: a higher financial norm increases inequality and required current account surpluses, reduces stability, and increases volatility and recessions length.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference27 articles.
1. Boyer, R. (2000). Is a finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis. Economy and Society, 29(1), 111-145.
2. Braun, O., & Joy, L. (1968). A model of economic stagnation. A case study of the Argentine economy. The Economic Journal, 78(312), 868-887.
3. Chena, P., & Biscay, P. (2019). El imperio de las finanzas. Deuda y desigualdad. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
4. Díaz Alejandro, C. F. (1963). A note on the impact of devaluation and the redistributive effect. Journal of Political Economy, 71(6), 577-580.
5. Diwan, I. (2001). Debt as sweat: Labor, financial crises, and the globalization of capital. Washington: Mimeo, The World Bank.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献