Author:
Coad Alex,Janzing Dominik,Nightingale Paul
Abstract
This paper presents a new statistical toolkit by applying three techniques for data-driven causal inference from the machine learning community that are little-known among economists and innovation scholars: a conditional independence-based approach, additive noise models, and non-algorithmic inference by hand. We include three applications to CIS data to investigate public funding schemes for R&D investment, information sources for innovation, and innovation expenditures and firm growth. Preliminary results provide causal interpretations of some previously-observed correlations. Our statistical 'toolkit' could be a useful complement to existing techniques.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference54 articles.
1. Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806-822.
2. Bryant, H. L., Bessler, D. A., & Haigh, M. S. (2009). Disproving causal relationships using observational data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(3), 357-374.
3. Bloebaum, P., Janzing, D., Washio, T., Shimizu, S., & Schölkopf, B. (2018). Cause-Effect Inference by Comparing Regression Errors. Presented at AISTATS. For an extended version, see https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06698.
4. Cassiman B., & Veugelers, R., (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184.
5. Budhathoki, K., & Vreeken, J. O. (2018). Causal inference by compression. Knowledge and Information Systems, 56(2), Springer. (IF 2.247).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献