Abstract
With the implementation of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), former military soldiers who were because of the armed conflict have been able to reduce sentences and obtain freedom. This document analyses the perception of the JEP by these soldiers based on a survey that identified the type of criminal conviction, the economic and family context, and the perception of the post-conflict for each of the participant soldiers. The results demonstrate that the interviewees consider the main harms of their imprisonment are a family breakdown and unfair treatment between the military and other actors. They hope that being included in the JEP will allow them to have job opportunities and get their families back.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. Agencia EFE. (2015, March 19). Justicia ordinaria debe juzgar los abusos de militares: CIDH. El Espectador. Recuperado de https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/judicial/justicia-ordinaria-debe-juzgar-los-abusos-de-militares-articulo-550380
2. Aguilera, M. (2009). Guerra, contrapoder y justicia insurgente 1952- 2003. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
3. Ayala Diago, C. A. (2006). El populismo atrapado, la memoria y el miedo: El caso de las elecciones de 1970. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. La Carreta Editores.
4. Bakiner, O. (2010). From Denial to Reluctant Dialogue: The Chilean Military’s Confrontation with Human Rights (1990–2006). International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(1), 47-66. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijp025
5. Benítez, P., Quintero, M., Márquez, K., y Ortiz, A. (2015). Beneficios y garantías de los miembros de la fuerza pública en marcos de justicia transicional en perspectiva comparada: lecciones para el caso colombiano. Revista Panorama 9(16), 105-116.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献