Author:
Arango Angela Maria Arango,Camargo García Juan Carlos,Castaño Rojas Juan Mauricio
Abstract
The sustainability of guadua forests under management was assessed throughout the emergy analysis approach. The system analyzed correspond to guadua forest whose major product are culms for commercial purposes. In order to calculate the sustainability, available information on purchased inputs, renewable and nonrenewable natural resources as well as external factors, which can affect the system such as labor or inputs (ie. fuel consumption), was used for calculate indexes which describe relationship among the employed natural resources. The results showed the guadua forest system under management does not depend on external inputs and its sustainability is above 90%. In fact, the recovery ability after harvesting shown by these guadua forests is associated with a proper management, which contributes to the ecosystem conservation of functions. Considering the current management conditions, the guadua forest system is sustainable although highly dependent on natural resources. Under these conditions, the system become vulnerable since the management should be focused on guaranteeing the current conditions and therefore, their conservation.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference20 articles.
1. Arango, A.M. & Camargo, J.C. (2012). Determinación de la huella de carbono de una empresa forestal productora de guadua. El caso de la empresa Yarima Guadua, Eje Cafetero de Colombia. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente, 65-66, 56-61.
2. Bonilla, S., Guarnetti, R., Almeida, C. & Giannetti, B. (2008). Sustainability assessment of a giant bamboo plantation in Brazil: exploring the influence of labor, time and space. J Clean Prod, 18(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.012
3. Brandt-Williams, S. (2002). Emergy of Florida agriculture. Handbook of emergy evaluation, a compendium of data for emergy computing issued in a folios series, Folio Number 4. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences. Gainesville, F. http://cep.ees.ufl.edu/emergy/documents/folios/Folio_04.pdf.
4. Brooks, K. N., Ffolliott, P. F. & Magner, J.A. (2012). Hydrology and the management of watersheds (evaporation, interception, and transpiration) 4th edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Eds.). London, UK. 533 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118459751
5. Brown, M.T. & Ulgiati, S. (1997). Emergy - based indices ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring, economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. J Ecol Eng, 9 (1-2), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00033-5
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献