What does ‘quality’ mean in the context of rural extension and advisory services?

Author:

Landini FernandoORCID

Abstract

The quality of rural extension and advisory services is a crucial element in fostering innovation and rural development. This article aims to clarify the concept of quality of rural extension and to develop a preliminary theoretical framework. An ample literature review was conducted in search of articles on service quality and quality of rural extension and advisory services. The first part presents the main results of the literature searchon quality of extension services. The definition of quality is not universal. Quality cannot be conceptualized only as farmers’ satisfaction or as extension results. It has different dimensions or components and stakeholders have different points of view about it. The second part of this article discusses the definition of service quality and the concept of Total Quality Management and underlines that the concept of quality variesaccording to industry types or contexts and is the result of complex negotiation among different stakeholders. Finally, a comprehensive theoretical framework for addressing quality of rural extension and advisory services is presented that differentiates among enablers that limit or facilitate the delivery of quality rural extension and advisory services, the production and delivery processes, and results obtained. Here, the key roleplayed by quality self-assessment and organizational learning is highlighted.

Publisher

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference94 articles.

1. Aguirre, F. 2012. El nuevo impulso de la extensión rural en América Latina. Situación actual y perspectivas. RELASER, Santiago, Chile. URL: http://www.redinnovagro.in/documentosinnov/nuevoimpulso.pdf (accessed 16 August 2019).

2. Akumu, G., J. Muyonga, and K. Frank. 2019. The influence of extension approaches on uptake of postharvest technologies among maize farmers in Uganda. Afric. J. Rural Devel. 3(4), 955-971. URL: https://www.afjrd.org/jos/index.php/afjrd/article/view/1687 (accessed 13 January 2020).

3. Alzaydi, Z., A. Al-Hajla, B. Nguyen, and C. Jayawardhena. 2018. A review of service quality and service delivery: towards a customer co-production and customer-integration approach. Bus. Process Manag. J. 24(1), 295-328. Doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-09-2016-0185

4. Anaza, N., B. Rutherford, and R. Widdows. 2012. Factors influencing perceptions of service quality in cooperative extension workers. J. Ext. 50(3). URL: www.joe.org/joe/2012june/rb3.php (accessed 16 August 2019).

5. Anik, A. and A. Salam. 2015. Determinants of adoption of improved onion variety in Bangladesh. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev. 109(1), 71-88.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. International comparison of extension agent objectives and construction of a typology;The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension;2021-06-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3