Engineering design, complexity in its teaching

Author:

Paz-Penagos HernanORCID,Pérez-Tristancho Carlos AndrésORCID

Abstract

The trend toward increasing the design component in engineering curricula is part of an effort to better prepare graduates for engineering practice. The objective of the article is to review and contrast some methodological strategies of engineering design teaching at the university level to analyze the psychological theories in teaching practice and the temporal location of these courses within 5 years of the program. The results of the bibliographic review made allowed us to infer psychological postures, preferably cognitive and constructivist, and the location of design courses in the first semesters of engineering curricula. However, engineering design courses are recommended throughout the degree (taking as a reference some results of the Saber PRO tests) in which students participate in applied projects, and get closer to the industry, as more favorable strategies for the adaptation of future engineers to the particular demands of the national productive sector.

Publisher

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Subject

General Engineering

Reference57 articles.

1. Villamil, E. y García, Introducción al proyecto de ingeniería - Libro de materia, [online], Buenos Aires, 2003. [consultado en: Noviembre 10 de 2021]. Disponible en: http://materias.fi.uba.ar/6612/archives/Libro_materia.pdf

2. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D. and Leifer, L., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education., 94(1), pp. 103-120, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

3. Anonym. La quinta disciplina – ¿Qué es el pensamiento sistémico?, Wordpress [en línea], May, 2011. [Consultado: Noviembre 10 de 2021]. Disponible en: https://pmqlinkedin.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/pensamiento-sistemico.pdf

4. Garcia, G., Un proceso general de diseño en Ingeniería Mecánica. Ingeniería e Investigación, 10, pp. 35-43, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.n10.19492

5. ABET. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016 – 2017, ABET [online]. 2016. [Retrieved 10 November 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#outcomes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3