Metallogenic Dynamics Background of Ga’erqiong Cu-Au Deposit in Tibet, China
-
Published:2017-04-01
Issue:2
Volume:21
Page:59-65
-
ISSN:2339-3459
-
Container-title:Earth Sciences Research Journal
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Earth sci. res. j.
Author:
Ouyang Yuan,Yang Wunian,Huang Hanxiao,Liu Hong,Zhang Jianlong,Zhang Jianhua
Abstract
The Ga’erqiong Cu-Au deposit, which sits on the north side of the Coqên-Xainzamagmatite belt, is a large-scale skarn-type deposit, whose ore body has formed in the skarn zone in the contact part of quartz diorite and marble of Duoai formation or the cracks of quartz diorite. Its mineralization is closely related to quartz diorite. And granite porphyry-related molybdenum ore still exists in its deep part. Currently, there are disputes about the metallogenic dynamics background of this deposit. From previous studies, this paper carried out zircon LA-LCPMS U-Pb dating and petrogeochemistry study for quartz diorite of Ga’erqiong Cu-Au deposit. The testing result indicates: quartz diorite and granite porphyry were formed respectively in 88±2Ma and 83±1Ma, belonging to the magmatic activity of the early stage of Upper Cretaceous; quartz diorite and granite porphyry have geochemical characteristics similar to those of island arc rock of subduction zone and geochemical indexes similar to “adakite.” Combining with the regional tectonic evolution, we think that quartz diorite and granite porphyry were all formed in the extension environment after the collision of Lhasa block and Qiangtang block. Quartz diorite is the result of the migmatization of basic melt and acid melt evoked by asthenosphere material raise caused by lower crustal delamination; the formation of granite porphyry may be crust-mantle material’s partial melting results due to delaminated lower crustal. Therefore, Ga’erqiongskarn-type Cu-Au deposit belongs to the metallogenic response to the collisional orogeny in the closing process of Meso-Tethys.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference38 articles.
1. Asis, J., Tahir, S. H., Rahim, A. R., Konjing, Z., Kob, R. C., & Tjia, H. D. (2017). Smaller benthic foraminifera Analysis of Kudat Formation, Kudat, Sabah: Preliminary Interpretation. Geological Behavior, 1(1), 27-29. 2. Boynton, W. V. (1984). Geochemistry of the rare earth elements: Meteorite studies. In: Henderson, P. (ed.). Rare Earth Element Geochemistry. Elsevier, 36(6), 323-338. 3. Chen, H. A., Zhu, X. P., Ma, D. F., Huang, H. X., Li, G. M., Li Y.B., ... Liu, C. Q. (2013). Geochronology and geochemistry of the Bolong porphyry Cu- Au deposit, Tibet and its mineralizing significance. Acta Geologica Sinica, 87(10), 1593-1611. 4. Compston, W., Williams, I. S., & Kirschvink, J. L. (1992). Zircon U-Pb AGES for the early cambrian time-scale. Journal of the Geological Society, 149(2), 171-184. 5. Coulon, C., Maluski, H., & Bollinger, C. (1986). Mesozoic and cenozoic volcanic rocks from central and southern Tibet: 39 Ar-40 Ar dating, petrological characteristics and geodynamical significance. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 79(3), 281-302.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|