FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF JUDGES' COMMUNICATION

Abstract

It is essential that the judicial function be public, discreet and professional. Its legitimacy as a public authority is obtained through the recognition of judgments, in which there is an identification between decisions and society. But what type of communication must be made by the judiciary, and especially by judges, to provide information about their activities and, thus, provide that their interaction with citizens strengthens the society by generating a greater connection between the sovereign and the public power?