CYBERCRIME MONEY LAUNDERING CASES AND DIGITAL EVIDENCE

Author:

Matić Bošković Marina M.ORCID

Abstract

The widespread dependence on digital systems and increased value of digital commerce in the metaverse boosted cyber vulnerability. The cybercrime will be more profitable than the global trade of all major illegal drugs combined, while Cybersecurity Ventures expects global cybercrime costs to grow by 15 percent annually by 2025. Cybercrime changed traditional money laundering methods which is difficult to detect since it could be committed from anywhere in the world. The threat posed by cybercrime money laundering methodologies has been aggravated by the Covid-19 pandemic. To investigate cyber laundering the e-evidence are crucial, which is confirmed by the EU Commission estimate that 85 percent of criminal investigations require electronic evidence. Additional challenge for law enforcement authorities presents the fact that the organised cybercrime is joining forces and their likelihood of detection and prosecution is estimated to be 0.05 percent in the USA. Furthermore, the digital evidence is often held by service providers as private companies based in another country, which causes many obstacles to access to those data by investigative and law enforcement authorities. The paper identifies impact of Covid-19 on cybercrime and increased risks of cyber laundering. In relation to investigation and prosecution of cyber money laundering, the paper analyzes challenges for investigative authorities to gather data and evidence in cyber money laundering cases and efforts of EU and USA authorities to facilitate access to digital evidence and relevant data stored by service providers. The paper refers to possible shortcomings of proposed instruments and need for efficient response and adaptation to changes in the cybercrime.

Publisher

Institute of Comparative Law

Reference26 articles.

1. Adams, R., Hobbs, V. & Mann, G. 2013. The Advanced Data Acquisition Model (Adam): a process model for digital forensic practice. Journal of Digital Foren¬sics, Security and Law, 8 (4), pp. 25-48, https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2013.1154.

2. Braid, M. 2002. Collecting Electronic Evidence After a System Compromise, Global Information Assurance Certification Paper for SANS Institute. Available at: https://www.giac.org/paper/gsec/659/collecting-electronic-evidence-system-compromise/101519.

3. Carrera, S., González Fuster, G., Guild, E. & Mitsilegas, V. 2015. Access to Electronic Data by Third-Country Law Enforcement Authorities. CEPS Paperback. Brussels: CEPS.

4. Carrera, S., Mitsilegas, V. & Stefan, M. 2021. Criminal Justice, Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law in the Digital Age. Report of a CEPS and QMUL Task Force, Brussels.

5. Carrier B. & Spafford, E. 2004. An Event-based Digital Forensic Investigation Framework. Presented at the Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Baltimore.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3