Abstract
The article provides comprehensive overview of the diverse landscape of supreme courts across Europe, offering insights into varying structures and functions they embody across different countries. It analyses supreme courts as the only supreme judicial institution or as a part of a broader supreme court system alongside supreme administrative court and/or constitutional courts. The article highlights the diversity in organization of supreme justice and offers a glimpse into a larger project on comparative supreme justice, indicating in-depth analysis of various factors such as the position of supreme courts in different states, recruitment process and the courts’ competencies on the European scale. The article provides valuable insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of supreme courts in Europe. Its approach to presenting specific examples enables a deeper understanding of the topic, making it a useful resource for readers interested in comparative legal systems and judicial structures in different countries. The paper identifies impact of filter model on a Supreme Court’s workload and efficiency of the Court, as well as on the structure. Furthermore, it refers to possible shortcomings of filter model and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in that regard.
Publisher
Institute of Comparative Law
Reference24 articles.
1. Bobek, M. 2009. Quantity or Quality? Reassessing the Role of Supreme Jurisdictions in Central Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(1), pp. 33-65. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0002
2. Bravo-Hurtado, P. & van Rhee, C. H. 2021. Supreme Courts Under Pressure - Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6
3. Bravo-Hurtado, P. 2014. Two Ways to Uniformity: Recourse to the Supreme Court in the Civil Law and the Common Law World. In: Uzelac, A. & van Rhee, C. H. (eds.), Nobody's Perfect. Comparative Essays on Appeals and Other Means of Recourse against Judicial Decisions in Civil Matters. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 319-335.
4. De Benito, M. 2021. Back in Focus: Case Overload and Case Selection Standards in the Spanish Supreme Court. In: Bravo-Hurtado, P. & van Rhee, C. H. (eds.), Supreme Courts Under Pressure - Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer, pp. 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6_4
5. Esposito, G., Lanau, S. & Pomple, S. 2014. Judicial System Reform in Italy: A Key to Growth. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475573022.001