Abstract
The main goal of this article is to examine to what extent citizens and their associations as a party in court proceedings can protect the environment in EU countries and Serbia, and also to identify main trends and limitations for access to justice in European legal systems. After analysing the three prevailing approaches to the regulation of locus standi in European countries, the aim of this article is also to determine the extent to which Serbian legislation fits into European legal systems. A normative-dogmatic method and a comparative legal method have been used in this article in order to analyse the legislation and practise in European countries in relation to the right of the public to protect the environment in administrative judicial proceedings. The article focuses on analysing the relevant international and national legislations and their implementation. The way in which locus standi is formulated is the key issue in exercising the right of the (concerned) public to initiate an administrative dispute for the protection of the environment and the protection of participation rights in environmental decision-making. Access to administrative courts in environmental matters usually implies that legal standing to initiate administrative disputes is granted to environmental civil society organisations (the public concerned), although citizens (the public) may also have standing in some cases.
Publisher
Institute of Comparative Law
Reference53 articles.
1. Aragão, A. 2013. Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.
2. Aragão, A. 2019. Environmental Standards in the Portuguese Constitution. In: Turner, S. et al. (eds.). Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612500.011
3. Cane, P. 2016. Controlling Administrative Power - An Historical Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878
4. Chevalier, E. & Eliantonio, M. 2017. Standing before French Administrative Courts: Too Restrictive to Effectively Enforce Environmental Rights?. Montesquieu Law Review,5, pp. 65-74.
5. Darpö, J. 2009. Environmental Justice through Environmental Courts? Lessons Learned from the Swedish Experience. In: Ebbesson, J. & Okowa, P. (eds.). Environmental Law and Justice in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576027.010