UNDERNEATH THE ROBOT JUDGE’S ROBE: DEMYSTIFYING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE THROUGH A GLOBAL SOUTH PERSPECTIVE

Author:

Simões Agapito Leonardo,de Alencar e Miranda Matheus,Januário Túlio Felippe Xavier

Abstract

Scientific and technological developments in the field of autonomous systems and artificial intelligence have provided and boosted their use in the most varied sectors of society. It is no different with activities carried out within the scope of criminal justice. Examples of these technologies being used in criminal investigations and procedures, including in assisting judgments, are increasingly frequent. However, it did not take long for questions to be raised regarding the limits of these systems and their possible impacts on the individuals’ guarantees. Although we cannot deny that some particularities of these technologies, especially of AI (such as the opacity and unpredictability of its output), pose risks to some fundamental guarantees in criminal proceedings, there is, in our view, at the basis of many doctrinal criticisms, a certain misunderstanding on what these technologies actually are, how they operate and how they are being used in the justice system. In view of this scenario, the aim of the present paper is precisely to investigate how artificial intelligence and autonomous systems have been used in criminal justice, so that we can identify what are, in fact, their potential impacts on Defendants’ rights and guarantees. For this, we will initially study the concept and operation of these technologies, so that we can understand their particularities. Subsequently, we will analyze their concrete application in the judicial sphere. For that, we will adopt as object of study, two of the best known systems of judicial assistance – HART and COMPAS – and the system used in Brazil, namely, the VICTOR. From the conclusions reached in the first two topics and applying the deductive methodology, we will seek to demystify some legends related to the so-called “robot judge”, identifying what are, in fact, its potentials and limits and which are the guarantees that are at stake.

Publisher

Institut za uporedno pravo; Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja

Reference54 articles.

1. Agapito, L. S., Miranda, M. A., Januário, T. F. X. (2021) "On the Potentialities and Limitations of Autonomous Systems in Money Laundering Control", RIDP 92(1), 87-108.

2. Braithwaite, J. (2013) "Does restorative justice work?" in: Johnstone, G. A restorative justice reader. 2.ed. London: Routledge, 320-352.

3. Traditional justice;Braithwaite;in Llewellyn et al (eds ) Restorative Justice Reconciliation and Peacebuilding New York Oxford University Press,2014

4. Many doors to international criminal justice;Braithwaite;New Criminal Law Review,2020

5. Bosi, A. (1992) Dialética da colonização. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Corporate Internal Investigations 4.0;Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal;2023-06-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3