Errors in the diagnosis of types of diabetes mellitus: causes and prevention strategies (literature review and own research results)

Author:

Gerush K.I.ORCID,Pashkovska N.V.ORCID,Ukrainets O.Z.ORCID

Abstract

The article provides current information regarding medical errors in diagnosing diabetes mellitus (DM), analyzes their factors, and outlines preventive measures. The causes of the most common diagnostic errors in diabetology include limited access to quality healthcare, insufficient training and number of qualified personnel, low quality of teamwork and medical information exchange, inadequate availability of diagnostic tests, poor coordination of care and follow-up, lack of medical informatics resources, human factors, and cognitive biases (such as misidentification of DM and its type, incorrect context creation, overestimation/underestimation of incidental findings, premature termination of the diagnostic process, and lack of knowledge and skills in diabetology). The most typical diagnostic discrepancies involve misidentifying type 1 DM (including latent autoimmune diabetes in adults), type 2 DM, and other specific types of DM. This is due to the increasing heterogeneity of DM, blurring of the boundaries between its types, atypical disease course, the decreased diagnostic value of the essential criteria for DM types (age, presence of metabolic syndrome signs, ketosis, dependency on insulin therapy), presence of comorbid conditions, and limited availability of diagnostic tests to specify the type of diabetes. To optimize diagnosis and prevent diagnostic errors, we have developed a Telegram bot DiaType based on a multilevel algorithm for the differential diagnosis of various types of DM. The testing of this Telegram bot has shown its high effectiveness in identifying DM variants. The advantages of DiaType include accessibility, interactivity, accuracy, and support for medical professionals, which helps improve diagnostic efficiency, simplify the diagnostic process, especially for primary care physicians, prevent diagnostic errors, and, consequently, improve treatment outcomes.

Publisher

Publishing House Zaslavsky

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3