Analysis of clinical series with the use of adjuvants to general anesthesia during elective caesarean section

Author:

Padalko A.A.,Dziuba D.O.,Halushko O.A.ORCID

Abstract

Background. Caesarean section remains one of the most common surgical interventions in the world. The main disadvantages of the general anesthesia in caesarean section are a high risk of awareness during the operation and a pronounced hemodynamic reaction to the surgical trauma in a patient. The most dangerous period of intervention in terms of these complications is the period before the birth of a child. This article analyzes our own clinical cases of the general anesthesia during elective caesarean section with the addition of adjuvants and compares anesthetic management with world practices. In all cases from our own clinical practice, total intravenous anesthesia with artificial lung ventilation was performed. Intravenous forms of medical drugs were used as adjuvants: paracetamol (1000 mg) and clonidine (100 μg), 30 minutes before the elective surgical intervention. The newborns were examined with the Apgar scale and umbilical venous blood gas analysis was carried out. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of patients was based on recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section and guidelines of the PROSPECT working group. Results. The analysis of our own clinical cases revealed the presence of a hemodynamic reaction of the patient’s body to the operative injury (in the period before the birth of a child), which does not exceed safe levels; absence of anesthetic complications and cases of accidental awareness during surgery; absence of a negative influence of adjuvants on newborns; sufficient depth of anesthesia and reduction of the intraoperative doses of opioids and intravenous anesthetics (“on patient’s request”). Conclusions. The analysis of clinical cases argues for the need to use “safe adjuvants” (acetaminophen, clonidine) to general anesthesia during elective caesarean section and the necessity for further research.

Publisher

Publishing House Zaslavsky

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3