Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The article attempts to provide a definition for the problem area of the philosophy of politics, political philosophy and political science. Given the lack of a well-established distinction between the subjects of these sciences in the Russian-language discourse, the author turns to the English-language tradition. The analysis of this discourse shows the following: 1) the absence of a distinction between political philosophy and the philosophy of politics, which is replaced by political ontology as part of political philosophy; 2) the existence of a distinction between political theory and political philosophy; 3) the dependence of the paradigm of the relationship between political theory and political philosophy on the consensus developed in the national intellectual tradition. In the English-language discourse, the question of the relationship between political science and political philosophy comes to the fore. The latter is considered as a subordinate, integral part of political science. It is shown that, based on the criterion of “insufficient scientificity”, attempts to exclude political philosophy from the political science do not stop. The article substantiates the position according to which, despite their apparent similarity, the subjects of political science and political philosophy do not coincide – the disciplinary ontology of political science can become the subject of political philosophy. When discussing the relationship between the philosophy of politics and political philosophy, the article presents several hypotheses. First, a distinction is made between the philosophy of politics and political philosophy and the author argues that they are distinct. Secondly, the position, according to which the philosophy of politics belongs to the field of philosophy, and political philosophy to political science, is critically examined, and the fact that the two disciplines belong to the philosophical corpus of knowledge is substantiated. Thirdly, it is proposed to demarcate between the philosophy of politics and political philosophy in accordance with the difference between their subjects. The subject of philosophy of politics is the phenomenon of the political, while the subject of political philosophy is political phenomena.
Publisher
Non Profit Partnership Polis (Political Studies)
Reference30 articles.
1. Ball, T. (2007). Political theory and political science: can this marriage be saved? Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 54(113). https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2007.5411302
2. Berlin, I. (1962). Does political theory still exist? In P. Laslett, & W.G. Runeiman (Ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society (Second Series) (pp. 1-33). Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Brod, H. (1992). Hegel’s philosophy of politics: idealism, identity and modernity. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.
4. Brown, A. (1990). Modern political philosophy: theories of the just society. London: Penguin.
5. Corbett, R.J. (2011). Political theory within political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(3), 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000679