Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Categorical Survey Items with High Missing Rates: Application to the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health and Eating (FLASHE) Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Categorical Survey Items with High Missing Rates: Application to the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health and Eating (FLASHE) Study

Published:2018-09-05 Issue:1 Volume:17 Page:
ISSN:1538-9472
Container-title:Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods

Author:

Liu Benmei¹,Hennessy Erin²,Oh April¹,Dwyer Laura A.¹,Nebeling Linda¹

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MA

2. Tufts University, Medford, MA

Publisher

Wayne State University Library System

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability

Reference21 articles.

1. The use of sample weights in hot deck imputation;Andridge;Journal of Official Statistics,2009

2. A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response

3. Cox, B. G. (1980). The weighted sequential hot deck imputation procedure. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods (pp. 721-726). Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.

4. Cox, B. G., & Folsom, R. E. (1981). An evaluation of weighted hot deck imputation for unreported health care visits. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods (pp. 412-417). Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.

5. How Many Imputations are Really Needed? Some Practical Clarifications of Multiple Imputation Theory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of five imputation methods in handling missing data in a continuous frequency table;PROCEEDINGS OF SCIEMATHIC 2020;2021