Affiliation:
1. "Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Studi letterari, Filosofici e di Storia dell’arte, Via Columbia 1, 00133 Roma, Italy "
Abstract
Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) couples of disputed beliefs (purely epistemic view, from here on PEV). While such a view seems to be a very natural starting point, my intuitions are that such an approach is misleadingly unrealistic, and that an empirical modeling towards how individuals hold beliefs in intractable opposition constitutes a strong defeater for PEV. My work addresses disagreements within the religious domain. Accordingly, I will be concerned with developing my empirical understanding of religious beliefs, and will show the consequences of such proposal on how to answer the problem of religious diversity.
Reference23 articles.
1. "[1] Alston, William P. 1992. P Alston, William P. 1992. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Reprint edizione. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. [2] Bertini, Daniele. 2016. Tradizioni Religiose E Diversita. Edizioni Fondazione Centro Studi Campostrini.
3. [3] Idem. 2018. «Three Kinds of Religious Vagueness». Dialegesthai 20 (dicembre). https://mondodomani.org /dialegesthai/articoli/daniele-bertini-07.
4. [4] Idem. 2019. «The Anecdotal Nature of Religious Disagreements». The International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 80 (3): 215-29.
5. [5] Idem. 2021. «Anecdotal Pluralism, Total Evidence and Religious Diversity». Philosophia