Abstract
This article proposes an interpretation of the metaphorical correlation (MC) as a mechanism of thinking aimed at the search for, and development of, a thinking strategy, set down and conveyed by language, that will be most effective in the given cultural and historical context. The MC mechanism is defined as a process by which some characteristics of an object (those selected by thinking) interact and some others are suppressed, with a chance at later actualisation. As a result, awareness of the self as an existentially non-static system bearing with it ‘the world as an accepted sense’ makes it possible to rethink the connection between language, thinking and perception. Here, a problem assuming a special prominence is attaining the obviousness and veracity (a primary cohesion of experience) by possessing which cognising agents construct a reality for themselves. The article considers Gustav Gerber’s ideas and Hermann von Helmholtz’s definition of perception as ‘unconscious inference’, as well as Immanuel Kant’s assertion about the ‘logical tact’ lying ‘in the obscurity of the mind’. Metaphorical correlation is shown to be able to act as a mechanism of a sui generis intuitive logic, which marks the starting point of cognitive reflection and paves the way for linguistic reality. Metaphorical correlation is a mechanism of abstraction and conceptualisation that determines the angles of cognitive reflection. The author concludes that if thinking is to be viewed as a calculus of the best possible strategy for interpreting experience (this vision is reflected in language, ever illuminating the substantive aspects of an object that are existentially important for a native speaker), the MC mechanism, which is immanently intrinsic to thinking processes, makes it possible to ‘calculate’ a thinking strategy whose adaptive value lies in the possibility of explicating the elements of experience for which there is a compelling existential need and inhibition of those whose explication is not requisite at the moment.
Publisher
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Subject
Philosophy,Language and Linguistics,History and Philosophy of Science,Cultural Studies
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献