Cosmology between Physics and Philosophy

Abstract

It is shown that the canonical cosmological model of the Universe – Big Bang Theory (BBT) contains unacceptably many unsolvable contradictions either to facts, or logic, or, finally, to physics. They can be categorized into several groups: 1) unacceptable, 2) unsubstantiated, and 3) multivalued. To the unac­ceptable fragments of the concept of BBT it is reasonable to include ideas about: a) “singularity”; b) “cosmological inflation”; c) “infinite death of Nature”. Un­reasonable include: a) hypothesis about materiality of space-time, b) recognition of the possibility of their birth and death. Among the interpretations admitting other ones with high probability are: a) the principle of equivalence of the iner­tial and gravitational masses, b) the gravitational redshift, c) the effect of deflec­tion of light near large masses. Among the interpretations, which do not cause doubts, it is possible to note an explanation of the black hole nature, following from Newton’s classical theory of gravitation. The source of insoluble contradic­tions of the BBT was Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (GTR), which was created on the basis of strictly deterministic classical mechanics. The underde­velopment of quantum mechanics at the beginning of the twentieth century mis­led the author of the GTR about the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. A consequence of this delusion was the erroneous recognition of space-time as material substances. It, in turn, led to a lot of unexplained events in the past of the Universe, and fantastic predictions about its future. But the most striking thing that distinguishes GTR is its violation of the fundamental law of conservation of energy, which cosmological theorists turn a blind eye to. This allows us to consider it a legacy of classical physics of the nineteenth century, unsatisfactory from the perspective of probabilistic physics of the twenty-first century.