Fatalities in value chains—an attempt to classify road traffic crashes in accordance with the United Nations General Assembly resolution 74/299

Author:

Kullgren AndersORCID,Stigson HelenaORCID,Rizzi MatteoORCID,Tingvall Claes

Abstract

Large corporations are today expected or obliged to report on accidental deaths and serious injuries to employed or contracted employed as a part of reporting on sustainability and workplace safety. Data about road crashes are part of such events and are therefore, but not separately, collected and presented. In Europe, 40% to 60% of all work-related accidents resulting in death has been reported to be road traffic accidents. In 2020, the Stockholm Declaration urged all corporations to report on their safety footprint including their entire value chain. The aims of the present study were to use a new definition of safety footprint and to quantify those killed as employed and at work, and those killed in a crash where the other part was at work, as so called third parties, to transports for duty with employed drivers. The Swedish Transport Administration (STA) in-depth database of fatal crashes was used, that covers all fatalities classified as road traffic related and consists of information from the police, medical journals, autopsy reports, accident analyses performed by STA, and witness statements. All fatalities excluding suicides or those caused by sickness occurring during year 2019 were investigated (n = 214). 11% (23/214) of the fatalities occurred when the killed person was at work and 16 while commuting. 37% of the fatal accidents occurred when the killed road user or the other part was at work. In total, almost half of the fatalities in the road transport system were related to work in some way when including both the fatally injured and their collision partners. A larger proportion of non-privately owned and procured vehicles was found for the vehicles of the collision partners compared to the vehicles of the fatally injured. In approximately one third of the fatal accidents a procurement of a transport service was involved. The Swedish Work Environment Authority (SWEA) identified 10 of the 23 fatalities at work investigated and none of these accidents was found to be investigated by the police as a crime related to the work environment. In conclusion, almost half of the fatalities in the road transport system in 2019 were related to work in some way, either the fatally injured or their collision partners were at work or while commuting. When including the third-party casualties, the problem becomes much bigger and more complex. In Sweden fatalities related to work are underreported, as the SWEA does not receive basic data. Efforts are needed to improve reporting of work-related road fatalities. It was found that the police did not investigate road traffic fatalities as death at workplace. It is crucial that the police start to follow the intention of regulations linked to workplace safety. If not, the possibility to collect relevant data for organizations to report on their safety footprint is limited. It is complicated to collect, classify and analyse value chain fatal crash information, mainly due to that the police do not investigate fatal road crashes as possibly work-related events. It is recommended that organizations manage their own data collection if they wish to report on their safety footprint data.

Publisher

Dept. of Technology & Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University

Reference17 articles.

1. DaCoTA (2012), ‘Work-related road safety’, EC FP7 project DaCoTA, Deliverable 4.8v, https://www.dacota-project.eu/Deliverables/Webtexts/Work-related%20road%20safety.pdf.

2. ETSC (2017), ‘Tapping the potential for reducing work-related road deaths and injuries (PIN Flash 33)’, European Transport Research Council, https://etsc.eu/tapping-the-potential-for-reducing-work-related-road-deaths-and-injuries-pin-flash-33/, accessed 2023-02-01.

3. ETSC (2020), ‘How to improve the safety of goods vehicles in the EU? (PIN Flash 39)’, European Transport Research Council, https://etsc.eu/how-to-improve-the-safety-of-goods-vehicles-in-the-eu-pin-flash-39/, accessed 2023-02-01.

4. EUROGIP (2009), ‘Road risks incurred by employees in Europe’, EUROGIP, Eurogip-40/F, https://eurogip.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Eurogip_risque_routier_2009_40F.pdf.

5. FIA (2022), ‘FIA Road Safety Index: A New Tool to Improve Road Safety’, Federation Internationale de l’Automobile, https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/fia_rsi_brochure_cmyk_b5_3mmbleed_v4e.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3