A note on Tesla's revised safety report crash rates

Author:

Goodall Noah J.ORCID

Abstract

Between June 2018 and December 2023, Tesla released quarterly safety reports citing average miles between crashes for Tesla vehicles. Prior to March 2021, crash rates were categorized as (1) with their SAE Level 2 automated driving system Autopilot engaged, (2) without Autopilot but with active safety features such as automatic emergency braking, and (3) without Autopilot and without active safety features. In January 2023, Tesla revised past reports to reflect their new categories of with and without Autopilot engaged, in addition to making small adjustments based on recently discovered double counting of reports and excluding previously recorded crashes that did not meet their thresholds of airbag or active safety restraint activation. The revisions are heavily biased towards no-active-safety-features—a surprising result given prior research showing that drivers predominantly keep most active safety features enabled. As Tesla's safety reports represent the only national source of Level 2 advanced driver assistance system crash rates, clarification of their methods is essential for researchers and regulators. This note describes the changes and considers possible explanations for the discrepancies.

Publisher

Dept. of Technology & Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University

Reference30 articles.

1. Blanco, M., J. Atwood, S. Russell, T. Trimble, J. McClafferty, M. Perez (2016), ‘Automated Vehicle Crash Rate Comparison Using Naturalistic Data’, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, https://www.vtti.vt.edu/PDFs/Automated%20Vehicle%20Crash%20Rate%20Comparison%20Using%20Naturalistic%20Data_Final%20Report_20160107.pdf.

2. Dixit, V. V., S. Chand, D. J. Nair (2016), ‘Autonomous vehicles: Disengagements, accidents and reaction times’, PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168054.

3. Goodall, N. J. (2021), ‘Comparison of automated vehicle struck-from-behind crash rates with national rates using naturalistic data’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 154, 106056.

4. Goodall, N. J. (2023a), ‘A note on Tesla’s revised safety report crash rates’, arXiv:2311.06187.

5. Goodall, N. J. (2023b), ‘Comparability of automated vehicle crash databases’, arXiv:2308.00645.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3