Abstract
Vehicle control can be described with lateral and longitudinal control measures. The Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) is probably the most common measure to reflect lateral control. Indices such as mean Lateral Position (MLP) and Time-to-Line Crossing (TLC) have also been used to describe driver behaviour. Even though all these measures have demonstrated their value, in some specific cases, these measures may indicate that driver behaviour is deteriorated while that may not necessarily be the case. When negotiating curves for example, most drivers prefer to not to follow the centre of the lane. We propose a new index, called the Cumulative Lateral Position (CLP), an index that does not suffer from drawbacks of the earlier mentioned measures in these conditions. We also applied the CLP in a practical case. In a simulator experiment drivers negotiated three types of curves: traditional circular (CIR), clothoid (CLO), and a new curve, a polynomial curve with continuous curvature (CON). Results show that the CLP index, unlike the older measures, is able to well summarise the trajectory on a road curve and is sensitive in distinguishing different driving behaviour with respect to variations in road geometry, even in cases where these differences are small. The proposed methodology can be used to evaluate both new and existing roads design solutions, and showed in this experiment that driving behaviour was safest in the continuous curve.
Publisher
Dept. of Technology & Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University
Reference20 articles.
1. Barendswaard, S., D. M. Pool, E. R. Boer, D. A. Abbink (2019), ‘A Classification Method for Driver Trajectories during Curve-Negotiation’, presented at 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) (Bari, Italy: 6–9 October 2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2019.8914301.
2. Barenswaard, S. (2021), ‘Modelling Individual Driver Trajectories to Personalise Haptic Shared Steering Control in Curves’, PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Cognitive Robotics, https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:7292e35d-d45a-4ad1-9663-ae2b5c5a9f16, accessed 11 December 2022.
3. Boer, E. R. (2016), ‘Satisficing Curve Negotiation: Explaining Drivers’ Situated Lateral Position Variability’, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49 (19), 183–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.483.
4. Bosurgi, G., A. D’Andrea (2012), ‘A Polynomial Parametric Curve (PPC-CURVE) for the Design of Horizontal Geometry of Highways’, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27 (4), 304–a312, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00750.x.
5. Bosurgi, G., O. Pellegrino, G. Sollazzo (2016), ‘Using Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing the PPC in the Highway Horizontal Alignment Design’, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30 (1), https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000452.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献