Windshield bias is real: 2019 news coverage of pedestrian traffic fatalities in the United States

Author:

Hickman JohnORCID

Abstract

Framing pedestrian traffic fatalities episodically rather than thematically, attributing responsibility to pedestrians for their own deaths and non-agential descriptions of traffic crashes reflects windshield bias. Pedestrian traffic fatality rates increased dramatically in the U.S. over the previous decade. Findings from this content analysis of 2019 U.S. news coverage supports conclusions that windshield bias is national in scope, varies between cities in the Sun Belt and Frost Belt, and is associated with reduced walkability and greater partisan segregation of cities. The 2016 vote for Republican Donald Trump was also positively associated with episodic framing.  An inverse association between word length and windshield bias was also established.  The data set analyzed included 366 news articles drawn from 78 news sources in 74 cities located in 30 states.

Publisher

Dept. of Technology & Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University

Reference49 articles.

1. Academic Expert Group, (2019), ‘Saving lives beyond 2020: The next steps’, Recommendations of the Academic Expert Group for the Third Ministerial Conference on Global Road Safety 2020, http://trafikverket.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1413366/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

2. Balsas, C. J. L. (2019), Walkable cities: Revitalization, vibrancy, and sustainable consumption, (Albany, NY, USA: SUNY Press).

3. Belin, M.-Å., P. Tillgren, E. Vedung (2012), ‘Vision Zero—a road safety policy innovation’, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 19, 171–179.

4. Buehler, R., J. Pucher (2021), ‘The growing gap in pedestrian and cyclist fatality rates between the United States and the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands, 1990–2018’, Transport Reviews, 41(1), 48–72.

5. Chermak, S. (1998), ‘Predicting crime story salience: The effects of crime, victim, and defendant characteristics’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(1), 61–70.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3