Abstract
This paper explores how Levinas redefines the traditional notion of prophecy shifting the emphasis from the content of prophecy to the figure of the prophet, thus making prophetic inspiration a key feature of ethical subjectivity. The principal aim of the paper is to analyse the resulting triangular structure involving God and the Other. This structure is inherently unstable because God is incessantly stepping back in kenotic withdrawal. I show how this fundamental instability is reflected in the structure of the phenomenalisation of God’s glory, the structure of obedience to God’s order, and the structure of the authorship of prophecy. The prophetic experience is marked by heterogeneity; it can never be completely appropriated. Responsibility for the Other brings the subject to light as a witness of the glory of the Infinite, but not as the subject of selfidentification.
Publisher
Eastern European Institute of Theology
Reference42 articles.
1. Ajzenstat, Oona. Driven back to the text: the premodern sources of Levinas' postmodernism. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2001.
2. Basterra, Gabriela. The Subject of Freedom: Kant, Levinas. NY: Fordham University Press, 2015.
3. Ben-Bassat, Hedda. "Narrative Transformation of Philosophical Ethics: Grace Paley's Dialogic Model and the 'Prophetic Subject' of Emmanuel Levinas." The Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature: REAL, 13 (1997): 401-418.
4. Bergo, Bettina. Levinas between Ethics and Politics: For the Beauty that Adorns the Earth. Basel: Springer, 1999.
5. Bernet, Rudolf. "The Traumatized Subject." Research in Phenomenology 30 (2000): 160-179.