Affiliation:
1. Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
The hybrid model of the social services sphere, which has formed during the transition of the planned economies to the market, suffers from certain limitations. Specifically, the main criterion to select services providers is cost reduction, while the services output and the population sufficiency with the provision of services are not taken into account, which contradicts the principles of the social state. The article aims to substantiate a methodological approach that allows forming a hybrid model for the social services sphere based on the principle of allocative efficiency, which provides for the comparison of the output by social services providers from the public, private and non-profit sectors of the economy. The methodological basis of the study includes the club theory, theories of public goods, competition, and efficiency. The major research method is comparative analysis. The paper proposes a method for building the said model for the social services sphere, where the criterion of hybridization is allocative efficiency. The papers forecasts the volume of social services industries’ output given the introduction of principle of allocative efficiency. Comparison of this data with the output of the existing hybrid model reveals that significant resources can be released to be potentially redirected to satisfy other social needs. This confirms the reliability of the formulated methodological provisions.
Publisher
Ural State University of Economics
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Metals and Alloys,Strategy and Management,Mechanical Engineering
Reference32 articles.
1. Barkov A. V., Serova O. A. (2016). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo na rynke sotsial’nykh uslug v svete razvitiya sotsial’nogo predprinimatel’stva: problemy garmonizatsii pravovogo regulirovaniya [Public-private partnership in the market of social services in terms of social entrepreneurship development: Problems of the legal regulation harmonization]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, no. 33, pp. 268–280. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-33-268-280. (In Russ.)
2. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Karzubov D. N., Leskonog N. Yu. (2017). Assessment of the quality of social projects implemented by educational organisations in Moscow with the participation of high school students and young teachers: the program and the results of the study. In: Brodovskaya E. V. (ed.) Sotsial’nye proekty obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiy g. Moskvy: obzor luchshikh praktik [Social projects of educational organisations in Moscow: A review of best practices]. Moscow: Sport i Kul’tura – 2000 Publ., pp. 17–69. (In Russ.)
3. Vasiltsova L. I., Nevyantseva N. N. (2017). Rynok sotsial’nykh uslug: vektory razvitiya i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie posledstviya [Social services market: Development ways and socioeconomic consequence]. Diskussiya = Discussion, no. 5, pp. 68–73. (In Russ.)
4. Gerlakh I. V. (2018). Sotsial’no-pedagogicheskiy proekt “volontery zdorov’ya” [Socio-pedagogical project “health volunteers”]. Nauchno-metodicheskaya rabota v obrazovatel’noy organizatsii = Scientific and Methodological Work in Educational Organisations, no. 2, pp. 63–65. (In Russ.)
5. Grishchenko A. V. (2014). Mekhanizmy formirovaniya finansovykh resursov nekommercheskikh organizatsiy [NPO financial resource formation mechanisms]. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Financial University, no. 4, pp. 64–74. (In Russ.)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献