Affiliation:
1. Center for Research in Competition and Economic Regulation (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia; Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
Regulating retail fuel prices, which are getting particularly volatile, is an urgent issue amid the shock period that the global energy industry is facing today. Price volatility, however, is a factor in coordinating consumers’ and fuel producers’ plans. Economic theory fails to explain why in some countries, during a shock period, governments tend to regulate retail prices, while in others they develop market pricing mechanisms in the fuel market. The article reveals the influence of Douglass North’s social orders on the tendency of governments to establish a price regulation mechanism in the retail fuel market. New institutional economics constitutes the theoretical framework of the study. Among the research methods are case analysis, comparative crosscountry analysis, and statistical analysis. The empirical evidence comes from regulatory legal acts, US and Russian state statistics on fuel prices for 2019–2023, and materials from the GlobalPetrolPrices project. The research results revealed differences in uncertainty assessments by the governments of countries with different social orders: for regulators in open access social orders, industry shock is the reason of finding a new way to adapt to market conditions; for regulators in limited access social orders, it is the risk of destabilization of the social order. Our findings help to outline the institutional rationale behind the implementation of industry-specific policies.
Publisher
Ural State University of Economics
Reference23 articles.
1. Andreeva A., Ionkina K., Sanishvili T. (2017). Empirical approach to the comparative analysis of social orders. Nauchnye issledo- vaniya ekonomicheskogo fakulteta. Elektronnyн zhurnal / Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, no. 2, pp. 51–71. https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2017-9-2-51-71. (in Russ.)
2. Golyashev A., Kurdin A., Kolomiets A., Skryabina V., Fedorenko D., Fedorov S. (2021). Fuel prices: Between the market and regula- tion. Energy bulletin. No. 103. Analytical Center under the Government of the RF. https://ac.gov.ru/uploads/2-Publications/energo/2022/energo_103.pdf. (in Russ.)
3. Grigoryev L.M., Kurdin A.A. (2013). Economic growth and energy demand. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE / The HSE Economic Journal, no. 3, pp. 390–406. (in Russ.)
4. Kolomiyets A.R., Fedorov S.I. (2023). From hierarchies to markets: The electric power industry’s path to consumer welfare. Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, no. 3, pp. 46–81. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-3-46-81. (in Russ.) Fedorov S.I. (2023). The influence of political power on models of industrial organization: An institutional approach. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost / Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 1, pp. 101–120. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869049923010070. (in Russ.)
5. Shastitko A.E., Markova O.A. (2020). Spontaneous demand for institutional change: Towards a behavioural theory of public choice. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost / Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 2, pp. 132–144. https://doi.org/10.31857/ S086904990009198-9. (in Russ.)