Affiliation:
1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
2. Gazprombank, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
In the last decade, ESG reporting has become an integral part of corporate disclosure in Russia. However, there is limited guidance about the determinants of corporate governance that affect ESG disclosure. The paper investigates the interconnection between board of directors’ characteristics and ESG disclosure in Russian public companies. Methodologically, the study relies on the agency and stakeholder theories. Descriptive, correlation and regression analysis were used as research methods. The sample includes the panel data on 34 Russian public companies, whose shares were traded on the Moscow Exchange between 2012 and 2021. We found that board independence, board diversity, and the presence of a sustainability committee had a significant positive effect on ESG disclosure. At the same time, the impact of the board size was predominantly negative. The findings proved that ESG reporting was mostly practiced by the largest (by assets) companies, while the indicators of profitability and risk were insignificant in the context of environmental, social, and corporate governance. The obtained research results can be used by business representatives as well as by legislators and regulators to improve ESG disclosure practices in Russian public companies.
Publisher
Ural State University of Economics
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Bataeva B.S., Kokurina A.D., Karpov N.A. (2021). The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 20–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-2. (in Russ.)
2. Belik I.S., Dutsinin A.S., Nikulina N.L. (2022). Financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies: The effect of ESG factors. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 44–55. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-6-4. EDN: GMAUYD. (in Russ.)
3. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. (2004). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta / Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, no. 4, pp. 118–191. (in Russ.)
4. Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2006). Ownership concentration in the corporate governance system: Evolution of ideas. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta / Russian Management Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–28. (in Russ.)
5. Ovsyanko D.V. (2002). Modern corporate governance and its implementation through the work of the board of directors. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta / Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University, no. 4, pp. 43–59. (in Russ.)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献