The effect of Open Access on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals

Author:

Chernova Olga1

Affiliation:

1. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Abstract

Numerous publishers view the Open Access (OA) model as one of the ways to strengthen journals’ position. Enhancing the visibility of publications is believed to increase research productivity. The paper explores the impact of OA on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals. The theoretical basis is comprised of the data management approaches and scientometric management. The methods of scientometrics, bibliometrics and comparative analysis were applied. The paper looks at the main scientometric indicators used in the Science Index ranking: journal impact factor, self-citation rate, authors’ h-index, and the share of downloads. The data for analysis were retrieved from the eLibrary platform. The sample of the study includes open and closed access Russian economic journals from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC). The results obtained indicate that scientometric indicators of OA journals are higher than those of subscription-based journals, while there are no significant differences between periodicals with paid and free publications. We have found that the OA model does not guarantee an increase in scientometric indicators: most of the titles in the sample are characterised by unstable scientific positions. The research demonstrates the opportunities for using scientometric and bibliometric analyses in the strategic management system of a scientific journal aimed at improving its academic reputation.

Publisher

Ural State University of Economics

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Abramov E.G. (2013). The open access journal model as a way to improve the quality of scientific publications in Russia. Nauchnaya periodika: problemy i resheniya / Scientific Periodicals: Problems and Solutions, no. 2(14), pp. 4–8. (in Russ.)

2. Mikhaylov A. (2020). Why Russian publications are read but not cited. https://indicator.ru/humanitarian-science/pochemu-rossiiskie-publikacii-chitayut-no-ne-citiruyut.htm. (in Russ.)

3. Moskaleva O.V., Akoev M.A. (2021). Forecast of the development of Russian scientific journals: Open Access journals. Nauka i nauchnaya informatsiya / Scholarly Research and Information, no. 4(1–2), pp. 33–62. DOI: 10.24108/2658-3143-2021-4-1-2-29-58. (in Russ.)

4. Semyachkin D.A. (2014). Open access to science: Myths and reality. Universitetskaya kniga / University Book, no. 3, pp. 66–68. DOI: 10.24411/1726-6726-2014-00001. (in Russ.)

5. Semyachkin D.A., Sergeev M.A., Kislyak E.V. (2016). Open access as native advertising of a scientific journal. Universitetskaya kniga / University Book, no. 7, pp. 45–49. DOI: 10.24411/1726-6726-2016-0001. (in Russ.)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3