Affiliation:
1. Surgut State University, Surgut, Russia
Abstract
The article aims to empirically test the hypothesis on the impact of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) practices and employees’ personal environmental concerns on the performance of Russian companies. The methodological basis is the theory of corporate social and environmental responsibility embodied in the ESG concept. Exploratory factor analysis and linear regression are used to assess individual factors of corporate responsibility and personal environmental concerns on the ability of companies to perform better, i.e. to achieve their long-term goals. The empirical basis is the survey data of 339 employees of Russian companies. The research results show that strategic aspects of environmental responsibility and corporate governance are strongly connected within a single theoretical framework, while social responsibility of companies and environmental concern can be identified as a separate area of managerial efforts. Originality of the chosen approach is related to the proposed structured questionnaire that reveals various aspects of personal environmental concern and contributes to ESG practices assessment. The conducted regression analysis has demonstrated a positive impact of ESG strategies on the performance of the Russian companies in question, showing that social responsibility plays a decisive role in the ESG formula. Environmental concerns of employees do not have a significant effect on their personal assessment of organizational performance. The authors propose that managers should implement the most relevant ESG practices discussed in this article to sustain high levels of organizational performance.
Publisher
Ural State University of Economics
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Arvidsson S., Dumay J. (2021). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937
2. Atan R., Razali F.A., Said J., Zainun S. (2016). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and its effect on firm’s performance: A comparative study. International Journal of Economics and Management, vol. 10 (S2), pp. 355–375.
3. Avramov D., Cheng S., Lioui A., Tarelli A. (2021). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 145, issue 2, pp. 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
4. Belyaeva Z., Kazakov A. (2015). Integrated approach to social responsibility: A model of stakeholders interaction in Russia and China. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2265
5. Boakye D.J., Tingbani I., Ahinful G.S., Nsor-Ambala R. (2021). The relationship between environmental management performance and financial performance of firms listed in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 278, 124034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124034
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献