Abstract
The late eleventh century witnessed the growing assertion of the Roman
pope’s role as judge over ecclesiastical affairs. Yet, the institutional
imagination behind these developments was more complex and fragile
and less developed than is often assumed. Using three specific witnesses
– Peter Damian; Atto, cardinal priest of San Marco; and Bruno, cardinal
bishop of Segni – this essay reveals the focused, but idiosyncratic, attention
that members of the Roman clergy paid to ‘the ecclesial imaginary’.
These witnesses reveal that the Roman clergy’s own consciousness of its
place and power was hard won mental terrain that had continually to be
reinforced and defended. They also reveal sustained effort to anchor this
transformed institutional consciousness firmly in the authority of texts.
Publisher
Amsterdam University Press