Conjugal and Nuptial Symbolism in Medieval Christian Thought

Author:

Reynolds Philip L.1

Affiliation:

1. Emory University

Abstract

Medieval scholars, clerics, and religious perceived important resemblances between marriage and the relationship between God or Christ and the Church or its individual members. They construed the divine–human relationship as a mystical marriage, but they also used such analogies to explain the laws and morality of human marriage and as the basis of the doctrine of marriage as one of the sacraments. This chapter explores the diversity of such comparisons. Having noted the limitations of symbolism as our overarching category, Reynolds proposes that the implicit common denominator within medieval thought was a notion of representation, that is, a resemblance posited between corresponding items on two hierarchically ordered planes, respectively spiritual or divine and corporeal or created. Lower things, construed as signs or figures, provided cognitive and rhetorical access to analogous higher things, whereas higher things could function analogically as exemplars that lower things were required to emulate. But these two vectors of comparison were not always coincident.

Publisher

Amsterdam University Press

Reference92 articles.

1. Aelred of Rievaulx, Sermon 51 (In ypapanti Domini), CCCM 2B:40–47.

2. Aelred of Rievaulx, Sermones XLVII–LXXXIV, CCCM 2B.

3. Alexander of Hales, Glossa in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi, 4 vols., Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi 12–15 (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1951–57).

4. Alexander of Hales, Quaestiones disputatae ‘antequam esset frater’, 3 vols., Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi 19–21 (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1960).

5. Ambrosius Catharinus [Lancellotto Politi], De matrimonio quaestiones plures, published as cols. 225–62 of an addendum included with Enarrationes R.P.F. Ambrosii Catharini Politi Senensis archiepiscopi Compsani in quinque priora capita libri Geneseos (Rome, 1551–52); reproduced in facsimile under the title Enarrationes, assertiones, disputationes (Ridgewood, NJ: Gregg Press,1964).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3