Affiliation:
1. Akita International University
Abstract
The drone is defined within the duality of indifference and depersonalization,
but also elevates a specific technology of seeing above
fluid expressions of collectivity. This chapter addresses the drone as a
mechanical device and figurative analogy of clarification that helped
to organize ideological divisions into an objective narrative of the 2014
military coup d’état in Thailand. To critique these droned hierarchies, I
draw upon Jacques Rancière’s conception of the ‘politics of aesthetics’ to
address independent Thai cinema as a regime of ‘fictionality’ where the
personalization of protest returns. The fictionality of Prapat Jiwarangsan
and Danaya Chulphuthipong, two Thai film-makers, reconfigures the
field of protest by extending its duration into an expanded realism of
post-coup oppression and resistance.
Publisher
Amsterdam University Press
Reference42 articles.
1. Adey, Peter. 2010. Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Profanations. New York: Zone Books.
3. Al-Saleh, Asaad. 2015. Voices of the Arab Spring: Personal Stories from the Arab Revolutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Asavanuchit, Pinit. 2013a. CU against Amnesty Bill 5 Nov 2013 [video], YouTube, 12 December. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRKjK_QmxXo. Accessed 31.03.19.
5. Asavanuchit, Pinit. 2013b. Patha chamai phlob kham [Chamai clash at dusk] [video], YouTube, 1 December. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tInPb0sw3U. Accessed 31.03.19.