The influence of different fertilization regimes on the yield and nutrient content of the sugar beet crop
Author:
Drobitko Antonina,Sharata Nataliia,Markova Nataliia,Kachanova Tetiana
Abstract
Sugar beet is one of the crops with high industrial significance, the reduction of the area of its crops in Ukraine in recent years actualizes the development of technologies for increasing yield and technological indicators of the crop. The research aims to study different regimes of applying mineral fertilizers on productivity, and the content of soluble sugars and proteins in sugar beet. The field study was conducted in the period of April-September 2023. The pre-sowing treatment was carried out using a hybrid of the productive and sugary direction Oleksandria employing deep ploughing up to 30 cm deep, the seeding density was 100 thousand/ha. The fertilization scheme provided for the introduction of a combination of complex fertilizers in one of two concentrations: N180P150K200 or N250P200K280 and a growth stimulator based on amino acids and trace elements Quantum. The application was carried out separately or in combination, the frequency of fertilization was one or two times. It has been demonstrated that the most pronounced positive effect on the increase in biomass and sugar content of beets is caused by the combined application of mineral macro fertilizers with the drug Quantum. In the case of the combined application option, the increase in the biomass of the root crop compared to the control was 120.8±8.5%-143.0±14.3%; the increase in the content of soluble sugars – in the range from 4.23±0.6% to 5.3±0.45%. An increase was also observed in comparison with the variants of separate applications of fertilizers. There was no significant difference between the two applied fertilizer concentrations, as well as when individual fertilizers and their combinations were re-applied. The content of proteins in terms of dry weight increased depending on the concentration and frequency of application of complex fertilizers. The obtained data on the increase in biomass of sugar content indicate the expediency of increasing these indicators is the use of a combination of mineral fertilizers containing macro- and microelements, so it is advisable to recommend a similar mode of fertilization. The data can become the basis for the development of recommendations for implementation in the industrial cultivation of sugar beet. Such techniques are economically feasible, as they allow for a reduction in the number of treatments and the consumption of fertilizer to obtain a harvest with high indicators
Publisher
Scientific Journals Publishing House
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference23 articles.
1. [1] Abbas, M., Soliman, A., Moustafa, Z.R., & El-Reheem, K.M.A. (2018). Effect of some soil amendments on yield and quality traits of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under water stress in sandy soil. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 40(1), 75-88. doi: 10.21608/agro.2018.2660.1091. 2. [2] Aghdam, M.Z., & Valilue, R. (2023). Effect of iron, zinc and boron on sugar beet yield and quality. Cross Current International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 5(1), 1-7. doi: 10.36344/ccijavs.2023.v05i01.001. 3. [3] Ali, A.M., Ali, A.M.K., & Hamd-Alla, W. (2023). Sugar beet productivity response to intercropping system and nitrogen fertilizer. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science, 8(4), 287-301. doi: 10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i4209. 4. [4] Aslanov, H.А., Aslanova, D.H., Agazade, G.F., Aliyeva, D.L., Hasanova, S.Z., & Quliyeva, L.N. (2023). The effect of planting scheme and fertilizer rates on the quality of sugar beet. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences, 11(1), 7-14. doi: 10.22194/JGIAS/11.1067. 5. [5] Bürcky, K., Heyn, J., Horn, D., & Koch, D. (2018). Nutrient uptake of sugar beet. Part II: Development of nutrient export from field. Zuckerindustrie, 143(9), 534-540. doi: 10.36961/si19839.
|
|