Abstract
Study’s Novelty/Excerpt
This study compares the utility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of microscopy with that of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) in diagnosing malaria among children in Specialist Hospital Sokoto.
The novelty lies in its focus on a specific pediatric population in a resource-limited setting, providing valuable data on the comparative effectiveness of these diagnostic methods in real-world clinical practice.
The findings highlight the higher positivity rate of microscopy, advocating for its continued use alongside RDTs to ensure accurate malaria diagnosis and optimal patient care in similar environments.
Full Abstract
Malaria is a life-threatening disease primarily found in tropical countries, and it is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children. Diagnosis of malaria depends largely on clinical presentations and laboratory diagnosis. Microscopy is the gold standard for laboratory malaria diagnosis but requires adequate training and time compared to Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs). The study compared the utility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values between microscopy and RDTs in diagnosing malaria among children accessing care in Specialist Hospital Sokoto. A total of 367 blood samples of consented children who met the study inclusion criteria were examined. All samples were screened for malaria using RDT thin and thick blood films. Of the 367 samples assessed, RDT was positive for 202 (55.0%) and negative for 165 (45.0%), while microscopy was positive for 235 (64.1%) and negative for 132 (35.9%), a non-statistically significant (χ2 = 0.090, P = 0.922) difference was observed when both positive tests were compared. The Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) showed a sensitivity of 85.95% and a specificity of 83.33%. This study confirms the higher positivity rate of microscopy to RDTs in diagnosing malaria. As such, RDTs are useful for rapid malaria diagnosis, especially in resource-limited settings; microscopy should be encouraged as much as possible for children to avoid missing any positive cases.
Publisher
Umaru Musa YarAdua University Katsina NG
Reference25 articles.
1. Abanyie, F. A., Arguin, P. M., and Gutman, J. (2011). State of malaria diagnostic testing at clinical laboratories in the United States: A nationwide survey. Malaria Journal; 10(340): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-340
2. Abeku, T. A., Kristan, M., Jones, C., Beard, J., Mueller, D. H., and Okia, M. (2008). Determinants of the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria case management: Evidence from low and moderate transmission settings in the East African highlands. Malaria Journal: 7(202); 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-202
3. Acheampong, D. O., Appiah, M. G., Boamponsem, L. K., ABoampong, J. N. and Afoakwah, R. (2011). The efficacy of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) in diagnosing Plasmodium falciparum malaria in some selected Health facilities in the cape coast metropolis of Ghana. Advanced Applied Science and Research; 2(1): 348-356
4. Amexo, M., Tolhurst, R., Barnish, G. and Bates, I. (2004). Malaria misdiagnosis: Effects on the poor and vulnerable. Lancet: 364(9448); 1896-1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17446-1
5. Azikiwe, C. C., Ifezulike, C. C., Siminialayi, I. M., Amazu, L. U., Enye, J. C. and Nwakwunite, O. E. (2012). A comparative laboratory diagnosis of malaria: Microscopy versus Rapid Diagnostic Test kits. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine; 2(4): 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60029-X