Practice with uncertainty integration improves performance on a qualitatively different task and with new visualizations

Author:

Files BenjaminORCID,Oiknine Ashley H.ORCID,Raber TIffany,Dalangin Bianca,Pollard Kimberly

Abstract

Background: Every day, people must reason with uncertain information to make decisions that affect their lives and affect the performance of their jobs and organizations. Visualizations of data uncertainty can facilitate these decisions, but visualizations are often misunderstood or misused. Previous research has demonstrated that deliberate practice with uncertainty visualizations can improve decision-making in abstract conditions, but it is not yet known whether the learning gains from this practice will transfer to more concrete, realistic, and complex decision-making tasks. Objective: Here, we test the degree to which practice integrating multiple sources of uncertain information with abstract 2-d summary or ensemble displays improves performance on a similar transfer task involving decision-making with a 3-d virtual sand table. Method: We conducted an online study with 378 participants who completed an uncertainty integration task in a 3-d virtual sand table context using either summary or ensemble displays of uncertainty. Participants had previously practiced with the same display, the other display, or received no opportunity to practice. We analyzed response accuracy and speed and how they changed throughout the task. Results: Results suggest that deliberate practice with abstract uncertainty visualizations allows faster decision making in the new context but does not improve accuracy. In the 3-d task, the summary display generally yielded similar or better performance than the ensemble display. Learning gains from practice transferred to both same-type and different-type visualizations in the 3-d condition. Conclusions: The results suggest that practice in the 2-d task enhanced facility with the underlying probabilistic reasoning in a new context rather than just increasing visualization-specific understanding. This implies that deliberate practice can be a beneficial tool to improve reasoning with uncertainty, including across contexts and across visualization types. Materials: Stimuli, stimulus software, anonymized data, and analysis scripts and related code are available online at https://osf.io/5xdsg/?view_only=8d422629a3784f6a80cfeae40e59a078

Publisher

Aalborg University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3