Affiliation:
1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution Higher Education “Kostychev Ryazan State Agrotechnological University”
Abstract
The current complex phenomenon of labor precarization has been extremely actively developed in the United States of America, especially over the past two decades. Undoubtedly, the main reason for the increase in the share of the precariat in the labor market is economic development based on a change in technological patterns, which is characterized in the capitalist economy, on the one hand, by an increase in the role of human capital, and on the other hand, by its overconcentration, including at the intra-country regional level. The emergence and development of a new form of labor relations invariably leads to the need to revise social policy. The regional aspects of the implementation of social programs considered in this paper, which are to some extent capable of mitigating the consequences of the instability of employment and the insecurity of labor relations in the United States for the period 2007–2020, serve as one of the explanations for the intensifying processes of regionalization observed in the country. The result of the study was the identification of two main aspects of the implementation of social programs at the level of subregions and individual states of the country. The first reflects the further regionalization of federal relations in terms of social support for the population, carried out without taking into account the growing precarization of labor in regions with the largest share of the precariat among the employed. The second aspect, which takes into account the structural features of the distribution of funding in the areas of education, health care and social protection of the population, reveals the authorities’ attempt to carry out balanced social programming in the subregions that are potential centers of the “new industrialization” of the American economy. This approach is aimed at preserving and qualitatively developing the human capital of the region by smoothing out the negative consequences of labor precarization.
Publisher
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE)
Reference28 articles.
1. Shlikhter A. Prekarizatsiia rynka truda SShA i kontseptsiia bezuslovnogo bazovogo dokhoda [Precarization of the US Labor Market and the Concept of Unconditional Basic Income], Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], 2023, No. 2, pp. 97–117. (In Russ.).
2. Toshchenko Zh.T. Fenomen prekariata: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovaniia issledovaniia [The Precariat Phenomenon: Theoretical and Methodological Basis for Research], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Research], 2019, No. 9, pp. 51–63. (In Russ.).
3. Thelen K. The American Precariat: US. Capitalism in Comparative Perspective, Camdridge University Press, Perspectives on Polities, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, March 2019, pp. 5–27.
4. Petrovskaia N.E. Molodezhnyi rynok truda v SShA [Youth Labor Market in the USA], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Modernity], 2021, No. 2, pp. 66–78. (In Russ.).
5. Shevchenko I.O., Shevchenko P.V. Ot prekarizatsii zaniatosti – k prekarizatsii zhizni? [From the Precarization of Employment to the Precarization of Life?], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [ Sociological R esearch], 2 022, N o. 7, p p. 6 3–75. (In Russ.).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献