Affiliation:
1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Russian Federation; National Asset Management Fund
2. Moscow University for Industry and Finance «Synergy»; National Asset Management Fund
Abstract
The article examines the most important categories, mechanisms, and instruments of the monetary policy of the Bank of Russia from the point of view of both its development and its implementation. The essence, origins and driving forces of the main contradiction of Russia's monetary policy are revealed. It is shown that monetary policy, along with the economic policy of the state, should act as a regulator of important meanings of human existence, such as the growth of real incomes of the population, directly affecting the redistribution of money – this market form of universal requirement for part of the national wealth. The author's position is presented, according to which inflation is not so much a macroeconomic indicator, as it is often customary to treat this phenomenon, as a fundamental process of a market economy that determines the redistribution of national wealth between economic entities through money. The authors identified and described the main problems and local contradictions in the development and implementation of a unified state monetary policy, presented a detailed description of these phenomena. The methodology of dialectical-systemic and logical analysis, which was used by the authors as a research tool, allowed for the first time to formulate the main contradiction of the unified state monetary policy. The presented formulation reflects the essential principles of the poles of contradiction – the contradiction between form and content. In order to solve the problems identified and existing for a long time, the authors justify the need to take priority organizational and legal measures, first of all, changing the statute, reforming functions, strengthening operational capabilities and staffing of the National Financial Council.
Publisher
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE)
Reference22 articles.
1. Glazev S. Yu. Nabiullina zalozhila dlya rossiyskoy ekonomiki zhestkuyu posadku [Nabiulina Provided Tough Landing for Russian Economy]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://me-forum.ru/media/news/15160/
2. Glazev S. Yu. Sanktsii SShA i politika Banka Rossii: dvoynoy udar po natsionalnoy ekonomike [US Sanctions and Bank of Russia Policy: Double Blow on National Economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2014, No. 9, pp. 13–29. (In Russ.).
3. Drobyshevskiy S. M., Trunin P. V., Kamenskikh M. V. Analiz transmissionnykh mekhanizmov denezhno-kreditnoy politiki v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Analyzing Transmission Mechanisms of Monetary-Credit Policy in Russian Economy]. Moscow, IEPP, 2008. (In Russ.).
4. Ivanchenko I. S. Inflyatsionnyy kanal transmissii denezhno-kreditnoy politiki [Inflation Channel of Transmission in Monetary-Credit Policy]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and Credit], 2006,No. 17, pp. 11–19. (In Russ.).
5. Karpunin V. I. Monte commune – voskhozhdenie dolga. Genezis globalnogo sistemnogo protivorechiya «kreditory – dolzhniki» [Monte-commune – Debt Rising. The Origin of the Global System Contradiction ‘Creditors-Debtors’]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2019, No. 2 (104), pp. 12–31. (In Russ.).