Author:
KONTHOUJAM AMBEDKAR SINGH ,NANGKAR IDDI,LANDGE AMOL,RANA MEENAKSHI,SRIVASTAVA SEWETA
Abstract
Agricultural production faces significant challenges due to the loss of crop yields, highlighting the need for improvements in pest management methods to enhance productivity. Crop growers are increasingly pressured to minimize the use of chemical pesticides without compromising yields. However, managing pests has become more challenging due to pesticide resistance and limited product availability. Consequently, there is an urgent requirement for alternative approaches. Entomopathogens such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes emerge as promising alternatives to broad-spectrum chemical insecticides. They have been widely employed to control insect pests in cultivated crops, employing successful strategies such as augmentation and classical biological control. These methods involve applying or introducing bacteria, baculoviruses, fungi, and nematodes. Utilizing entomopathogens offers numerous benefits beyond their effectiveness. These advantages encompass the capacity to treat expansive areas with a sole application, ensuring safety for both humans and non-target organisms. Additionally, their use leads to decreased pesticide residues in food, the conservation of natural enemies, and a boost in biodiversity within managed ecosystems. Entomopathogens present a viable solution by offering effective pest control while addressing environmental, human health, and ecosystem sustainability concerns. The primary emphasis of this review is on the present condition of bio-formulations, the pathogenicity associated with entomopathogens, their mode of action, and the possible implementation of diverse microbial formulations aimed at achieving sustainable pest management.
Publisher
Informatics Publishing Limited
Reference109 articles.
1. Adang, M. J., Crickmore, N., and Jurat-Fuentes, J. L. 2014. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxins and mechanism of action. Adv in Insect Phys, 47: 39-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800197-4.00002-6
2. Akhurst, R. J., and Boemare, N. E. 1990. Biology and taxonomy of Xenorhabdus. Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological Control (pp. 75–90). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351071741-5
3. Ansari, M. A., Shah, F. A., and Butt, T. M. 2010. The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema kraussei and Metarhizium anisopliae work synergistically in controlling overwintering larvae of the black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus, in strawberry growbags. Biocontrol Sci Tech, 20(1): 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150903420031
4. Arif, B. M., Pavlik, L., Haeussinger, D., Vlak, J. M., and van Oers, M. M. 2007. In vivo modulation of innate cellular immune response of Trichoplusia ni by Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol, 88(10): Article 27112719.
5. Askary, T. H., and Abd-Elgawad, M. M. M. 2021. Opportunities and challenges of entomopathogenic nematodes as biocontrol agents in their tripartite interactions. Egypt J Bìol Pest Control, 31: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00391-9