Affiliation:
1. Ulyanovsk Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture — Branch
of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin
Abstract
Relevance. The appearance of weeds in the fields of farms does not always imply their complete destruction, since from an economic point of view this may be ineffective. Therefore, in order to predict the effectiveness of crop contamination control in specific soil and climatic conditions, an urgent task is to develop and substantiate models of weed harmfulness and calculate economic thresholds for their harmfulness.Methods. The harmfulness of gray bristle (Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv) and green bristle (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv) in the conditions of the Agro-Invest Plus LLC enterprise in the Karsunsky district of the Ulyanovsk region in 2021–2022 on the yield of Despina barley was studied. The economic harmfulness thresholds were calculated against the background of the use of herbicides Ovsyugen Super, CE — 0.5 l/ha; Axial 50, CE — 0.9 l/ha; Puma Super, EMV — 0.9 l/ha; Avantik Turbo, MD — 0.5 l/ha. The scheme of the experience included: Option 1 — without weeds (control), 2–6 options — with the number of weeds, respectively, 10 pcs/m2, 20 pcs/m2, 30 pcs/m2, 40 pcs/m2, 50 pcs/m2, option 7 — with natural blockage. The accounting area of the plot is 1 m2, the location is systematic with an offset, the repetition is 6 times.Results. Based on field experiments, predictive models have been developed to determine the harmfulness of weeds, which make it possible to establish economic thresholds for their harmfulness in the conditions of a particular farm. The harmfulness of the bristle according to the linear function was 0.106–0.147 c/ha, depending on the amount (pcs/m2) or 0.322–0.291 c/ha by weight (g/m2). According to prognostic models, the proportion (%) of changes in barley grain yield from contamination ranged from 79 to 85%. Studies have shown that chemical weeding is advisable in the presence of bristles in barley phytocenoses from 8 to 15 pcs/m2.
Reference12 articles.
1. Okazova Z.P., Khanieva I.M., Adaev N.L., Nakaev S.-M.A., Kokov T.A., Zabakov A.B. Harmful plants in winter barley crops as an indicator of the level of agricultural culture. International Agricultural Journal. 2023; (3): 297‒300 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/enrebj
2. Dvoryankin E.A. Frequency of occurrence and harmfulness of weeds in sugar beet fields under the Central Blackearth Region conditions. Sahar. 2019; (6): 46‒50 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ztnfln
3. Caftan Yu.V. The influence of predecessors and mineral fertilizers on weed infestation of soft wheat crops in Orenburg Priuralye. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2020; (3): 34‒38 (in Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/iwyjii
4. Spiridonov Yu.Ya., Budynkov N.I., Dudkin I.V., Strizhkov N.I., Suminova N.B. Influence of various weed control measures in crop rotation on the final field’s clogging. Agrokhimiya. 2020; (12): 38–44 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120120108
5. Das T.K., Ahlawat I.P.S., Yaduraju N.T. Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) resistance to clodinafop-propargyl in wheat fields in north-western India: Appraisal and management. Weed Biology and Management. 2014; 14(1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12028