Affiliation:
1. Scientific Research Institute of Selection and Seed-Growing named after P.N. Konstantinov — Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Samara Federal Research Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Relevance. Among the pathogenic microflora of cereals, seed infection occupies the most important place, in this regard, the search for any ways to reduce it is very relevant.Methods. The research was conducted at the VSRISSG — Branch of SamSC RAS on seeds of 3 varieties of winter soft wheat of 2020 harvest, selected at different stages of harvesting and post-harvest grain processing: from ears before harvesting, from the harvested crop from under the combine and after grain processing on the seed cleaning machine Petkus К-531. Seed infestation was determined according to GOST 12044-93. After identification of phytopathogenic fungi, their percentage frequency of occurrence and relative abundance were calculated.Results. Seed infestation after combine harvesting increased for all varieties on average by 9.2%, and after grain treatment on Petkus — by 6.2% compared to seeds sampled from ears. The saturation of crop rotations with cereals from 30 to 50% lead to an 8.7% decrease in the number of healthy seeds in the samples (from 37.0 to 28.3%). Seeds were most often infected by fungi causing moulds with the frequency of occurrence from 32.9 to 39.1% and relative prevalence from 40.8 to 55.2% depending on the stage of harvesting. Moreover, the content of this group of mushrooms decreased during harvesting (compared with grain from ears) by 6.2% after harvesting by a combine harvester and by 3.4% after grain processing. During combine harvesting, the frequency of occurrence of fungi Fusarium sp. and Alternaria sp. it increased by 4.7–4.8% on seeds, and after cleaning it decreased again, but it was still 1.5–2.4% higher than on seeds from ears.
Reference13 articles.
1. Singh J., Chhabra B., Raza A., Yang S.H., Sandhu K.S. Important wheat diseases in the US and their management in the 21st century. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023; 13: 1010191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1010191
2. Grushko G.V., Linchenko S.N., Khan V.V. Characteristics and conditions of distribution of the head blight of winter wheat in the southern regions of Russia. Modern problems of science and education. 2005; (2): 46 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ijfzqv
3. Khilevsky V.A. Phytopathological examination of seeds and protection of spring barley in Rostov region. Symbol of Science. 2016; (6–2): 35–37 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/wdfuyf
4. Gagkaeva T.Yu., Gavrilova O.P., Orina A.S., Ablova I.B., Bespalova L.A. Distinctive metabolites of Alternaria, Fusarium and Microdochium fungi as a tool for assessing their relationship in micobiota of wheat grain. Plant Biotechnology and Breeding. 2018; 1(1): 7–15 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30901/2658-6266-2018-1-7-15
5. Zargaryan N.Yu., Kekalo A.Yu., Nemchenko V.V. Contamination of seeds and plants of wheat with phytopatogenes of Fusarium genus, methods of recovery. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2022; (4): 96–101 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18286/1816-4501-2022-4-96-101