Abstract
It is often claimed that Einstein is wrong about quantum mechanics. However, when comparisons are made with respect to theoretical foundations rather than experimental results Einstein’s theories are found to be superior. Although quantum mechanics correctly predicts what it is possible to observe (the emissions) with remarkable accuracy it ignores the other half of natural phenomena, that which cannot be observed (the absorptions), thereby violating the conservation of energy. Similarly, the conservation of momentum is violated by disregarding unobservable molecular impulses. Despite irrefutable proof that molecular impulses transfer momentum asymmetrically as shown by Einstein’s derivation of the A and B coefficients, the wave function is assumed to apply symmetrically in time. The deficiencies are corrected by introducing Hamilton’s principle and deriving relativistic equations of motion. This allows non-relativistic quantum mechanics to be described with a physical model and wave function behavior to be interpreted as the combined action of a particle and its associated quantized field. The calculus of variations is applied to the wave function to show that it is an incomplete equation of motion because it yields twice the allowable action minimum. The concept of reality is redefined by showing that reductionism applies to classical phenomena, but not quantum phenomena.
Reference13 articles.
1. Bothwell, T. et al. (2022). Resolving the gravitational red shift within a millimeter atomic sample. Nature, 602(7897), 420. arXiv:2109.12238
2. Guellati-Khelifa, S. (2023). Searching for new physics with the electron’s magnetic moment. Physics, 16, 22.
3. Einstein, A. (1917). Quantum theory of radiation. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 18, 121.
4. Heisenberg, W. (1925). Quantum mechanical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations. In B.L. van der Waerden (Ed.), Sources of Quantum Mechanics (pp. 879). Dover.
5. Einstein on measurement theory: A heuristic point of view