Abstract
It has been known for over 100 years that there is a discrepancy between Maxwell’s electrodynamics and the idea of a classical electron as the “atom” of electricity. This incompatibility is known under the terms 4/3 problem and radiation reaction force and has been circumvented in the currently most successful theories, the quantum field theories, by limit value considerations, by the mutual subtraction of infinities, i.e. by purely mathematical methods that eliminate obvious contradictions but are not really based on an intuitive understanding and can therefore never really be understood by the physically interested public. The actual cause of the classical problem lies in the instability of the classical electron. Stabilization cannot be achieved within the framework of Maxwell’s electrodynamics. This raises the question of what a minimal change in the foundations of electrodynamics should look like that contains Maxwell’s theory as a limiting case. A detailed analysis of the 4/3 problem points to models that fulfill these requirements.
Reference13 articles.
1. M. Abraham. (1903). Prinzipien der dynamik des elektrons. Ann Phys. 10:105–179.
2. H. A. Lorentz. (1909). The theory of electrons. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner. (B.g. Teubners sammlung von lehrbüchern auf dem gebiete der mathematischen wissenschaften mit einschluss ihrer anwendungen; vol. 29).
3. Max Abraham. (1905). Elektromagnetischs theorie der strahlung. erste Auflage. Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von B.G. Teubner. (Theorie der elektrizität / von dr. M. abraham; vol. 2).
4. F. Rohrlich. (1960). Self-Energy and Stability of the Classical Electron. American Journal of Physics. 28(7):639–643. doi:10.1119/1.1935924
5. Fritz Rohrlich. (2007). Classical charged particles. 3rd ed. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/6220